iConference AG
AI that lands

AI meets SharePoint: a pain to set up, a win to run.

We rolled out a company-wide AI layer at an SME: an AI assistant (Claude Opus 4.8, as of 06/2026), connected to Microsoft Graph via MCP, covering SharePoint, email and Teams. The short verdict first: setting SharePoint up was tedious. Running it is not. And on balance, the rollout clearly pays off.

What was tedious to set up

The build was a slog. SharePoint is a chore to handle: a sluggish interface and a logic of sites, libraries and permissions that doesn't explain itself. What saved the build was, of all things, the AI assistant itself — it helped structure, permission and tidy up, instead of leaving us alone with the Microsoft docs.

Why daily use convinces

In daily use the picture flips. That very Microsoft 365 storage works as a lightweight RAG: staff ask in plain language, the assistant fetches the right document and cites the source as it goes — no vector database, no pipeline of our own. The same goes for email and Teams. The knowledge already in the house becomes queryable.

Flow: employees ask a question in plain language, the AI assistant (Claude Opus) fetches the answer from SharePoint, email/Outlook and Teams via Microsoft Graph and MCP — and replies with the source. Lightweight RAG, no vector database.
The assistant fetches the answer from your existing M365 data — and cites the source.

When the effort pays off

Who it pays off for: anyone already running Microsoft 365 gets a viable AI layer on their own data with manageable effort — no new system, no data migration. The expensive route, moving data into a separate vector database first, isn't needed to get started.

To be honest: getting in takes patience, and SharePoint won't become pretty for it. But the hurdle sits in the setup, not in daily use — and it only comes up once.

Setup is the price. Running it is the payoff.

We guide Swiss SMEs along this path — human, competent, holistic.

Read next

20 August 2026

«That is just how I do it» cannot be delegated

An AI does ask questions when the brief is unclear. It cannot ask about what nobody ever wrote down. Why the process description belongs to the people who run it.

Read →
12 August 2026

Public tender: using AI, or using AI properly

A public building services tender answered from a personal ChatGPT account stays generic. What Claude from Anthropic takes over once it is connected to SharePoint and the CRM.

Read →
4 August 2026

Sovereignly hosted in Switzerland, wrongly confirmed

Three sovereignly hosted AI models, two frontier models, the same three questions on a fictitious quote. On the hardest one, every open model confirmed a wrong number.

Read →